Skip to content
Zoios

Solution

Measure employee satisfaction for free

Track satisfaction with 2-minute, science-backed surveys. Get meaningful insights, automatic reminders, and reports your leaders can actually act on.

People & Culture teams that lead with Zoios

VeoRejsekorte-BoksDonkey RepublicBech-BruunSoundboksKOMBITRoskilde FestivalECIT
01 / 07

Questions backed by science.

Our surveys are built on scientifically validated questions, battle-tested and benchmarked across 1,000+ teams in 47 countries. You're not measuring fluff; you're working with real data.

  • 11 validated Pulse questions
  • Industry & company-size benchmarks
  • Data-driven measurements
Benchmark · Tech · 800 teams
Engagement distribution
Top 20%Top 10%Industry 78You · 755060708090100
02 / 07

Honest feedback, because it's anonymous.

Responses are end-to-end encrypted and aggregated only when teams are large enough to protect identity. Employees speak freely; you hear what they actually think.

  • AES-256 end-to-end encryption
  • Strong anonymization protocols
  • SOC 2 Type II certified
HRSafe
6 people
From anonymous
"Onboarding flow improved a lot"
From anonymous
"Manager actually listens now"
FinanceSafe
7 people
From anonymous
"Q-end pressure is intense"
From anonymous
"Need clearer ownership on close"
DesignHidden
3 people
⚠ too small
need 2 more
03 / 07

No manual work. Runs on auto-pilot.

Sync your team, send the survey, and Zoios handles the rest: reminders, segmentation, anonymization, benchmarking, analysis, and a tailored report for every team. End-to-end on auto-pilot.

  • Employee sync · CSV or HRIS
  • Mail + Slack send-out & reminders
  • Reports built per team, every cycle
End-to-end automation
Nightly sync · Real-time pipeline
Employee syncNightly · 00:00
412 employees · auto-synced from HRIS
Survey send-outReal-time
mail + Slack · the moment a pulse goes live
Reminders sentReal-time
nudge non-responders automatically
SegmentationReal-time
splitting by team · region · tenure
AnonymizationReal-time
hash · k ≥ 5
BenchmarkingReal-time
vs. industry · vs. previous
Analysis & recommendationsReal-time
AI root-cause · suggested actions
Build report (per team)Real-time
live dashboards · 24 reports
04 / 07

Catch problems before they grow.

Run pulse surveys at the cadence that fits your team, monthly or quarterly. They surface drift weeks before an annual survey would. Spot the early signal, like optimism in Engineering dipping after a strategy shift, and act before it becomes a people problem.

  • Monthly or quarterly cadence
  • Anomaly detection per team
  • See reason for drop or uplift
Optimism · Engineering
Optimism, last 5 pulses + projection
Strategy shift
JanFebMarAprMay
!
Optimism in Engineering is dropping
likely cause: new strategic direction · -19 over 3 months
05 / 07

AI that finds the root cause.

Trained on thousands of teams, our models cluster open comments, attribute the underlying causes, and recommend concrete actions you can take this week.

  • Qualitative feedback analysis
  • Root-cause attribution per theme
  • Ranked action recommendations
147 comments · 3 root causes
147Comments
42%Meeting overload
Block focus time
28%Career path unclear
Deploy a leveling framework
18%Tool fragmentation
Audit overlap
06 / 07

See which teams need attention.

Every team gets a live engagement and strain score, along with trend lines. Themes sorted by urgency. Drill into the root cause behind the issue, and walk into your next 1:1 already knowing which conversation matters most.

  • Engagement & strain score per team
  • See every theme as it develops
  • Concrete action recommendations
Attention queue
Sorted by priority
01
Engineering
Well-being · -11%
59
02
Sales
Workload · -6%
68
03
Operations
Recognition · 0%
74
04
Marketing
Life harmony · +2%
78
05
Product
Support · +3%
80
06
Customer Success
Contribution · +5%
86
07 / 07

Useful for every role.

Executives get the org-wide picture. Managers get a report tuned to their team. Teams get a conversation guide for their next retro. One survey, three audiences, each with exactly what they need.

  • Executive view · org-wide signals
  • Manager view · team-level drilldown
  • Team view · conversation guide
One pulse · insights for every role
Pulse data
79 responses (93%)
Executive
Exec + HR
Org-wide insights
Company overview
Org. trends
Cross-team heatmaps
Manager
Per manager
Team report
Team health score
Drivers & detractors
Recommended actions
Team
Per team
Discussion guide
Talking points
Shared wins
Open questions
Average six-month uplift

Numbers that move.

Across customers who adopt Zoios and act on the signals.

+14%
job satisfaction
+18%
well-being
−19%
work stress

Why most attempts fail

Why most companies struggle to measure employee satisfaction

Most organizations measure employee satisfaction the wrong way. Long annual surveys designed by committee, analyzed for weeks, and acted on months after employees have moved on. By the time results reach managers, the workplace has changed and the moment to intervene has passed.

The problem is not that companies do not care. It is that they are using approaches designed for a different era, when work was stable, teams were static, and once-a-year check-ins made sense. Today's workplace moves faster, and your employee satisfaction measurement needs to match that pace.

3 common mistakes

The 3 mistakes companies make with satisfaction surveys

Mistake 1: Designing an opinion-based survey

Everyone has an opinion on what to ask employees. The CMO wants to ask about collaboration. The CFO wants to know about change management for the recent IT project. The CSO wants strategy-alignment questions. Before you know it, you have a 50-question employee satisfaction survey designed by committee.

The problem? There is a lot of scientific research on what questions best measure employee satisfaction and what actually predicts retention. Using validated frameworks means you get benchmarks to interpret whether the scores are actually bad, okay, or good.

Using a proven framework also adds credibility to the measurements. Do not spend all your time defending a homemade survey setup that everyone has an opinion on. Skip the opinion club and use proven science instead.

Mistake 2: A long 30 to 50 question survey

Everyone is busy, especially your managers. You want a high participation rate for your employee satisfaction survey, and to accomplish that the survey needs to be short and focused. We recommend a maximum of 15 questions, and preferably 10 to 12 of them quantitative, as they are much faster to answer.

Use a system where employees do not need to answer their department, age, or gender. Good software has that information in the background and merges the employee information with the survey answers automatically in the analysis phase.

Another way to make your survey more engaging and relevant is to ask conditional questions. If an employee seems to have issues specifically with recognition, follow up with an intelligent question: "Seems like you are not satisfied with the level of recognition you are experiencing. Can you describe why that is?" This works far better than a generic open comment section at the end. One of our projects showed that people who get an intelligent live question based on their rating provide 31% more feedback on the issues they are experiencing.

Mistake 3: Measuring just once a year

Measurements are a snapshot in time. Our research suggests that employees have a lot of recency bias, and generally answer based on their past 2 to 4 weeks of experience at work. That is what their current state of mind is based on. So you have to design a reliable satisfaction measurement protocol that factors this in.

Ideally you measure satisfaction once a month, but for many companies that is too frequent, and they end up going for bi-monthly or quarterly measurements, which is a huge improvement from the annual survey. With annual surveys, we are essentially navigating blindly 11 months of the year.

Companies that track satisfaction quarterly or monthly catch problems 6 to 8 weeks before they become resignations or sick leave. That is your intervention window. Annual surveys give you zero window.

3 criteria for real impact

The 3 criteria for real impact in measuring satisfaction

Getting the survey design right is only half the battle. The other half is execution. You can have a perfectly scientific 10-question survey, but if only 40% of people respond and it takes six weeks to generate reports, you have wasted everyone's time.

Criterion 1: Ensure a high response rate

We all hate reminding people to answer a survey, but it is necessary in almost every organization. Our experience with pulse surveys is that roughly 50% of people answer each time we send a reminder. The first reminder gets 50% of non-responders to answer, the second 25%, the third 13%, the fourth 7%, and that is how we help companies hit a 90% response rate.

Smart systems do not remind everyone but only the ones who have not answered yet. Sending reminders on multiple channels like email and Slack also helps, especially if you have employee groups that mostly communicate internally with colleagues on Slack (engineers, for example) rather than email.

Criterion 2: Turn data into reports quickly

Employee satisfaction is not static. These measurements are a snapshot representing the dominant employee experience over the past 2 to 4 weeks. So it is not ideal if you spend 4 or 6 weeks after people have answered before managers have a report for their team or the executive team has a report on the organization.

You should strive to have all analyses and reports done within a week or two after the survey closes. Many keep a survey open for a month, but we would recommend a short one-week window (maximum 2 weeks) to ensure the results are still valid when you review them in teams, departments, and on a company level.

Using a platform like Zoios ensures that analysis, visualizations, and reports are instantly available as the data comes in. Modern software generates analytics in real time, with no waiting for spreadsheet gymnastics or manual deck creation.

Criterion 3: Ensure managers get recommended actions

HR and executives are used to this type of work. Managers, however, are busy and not always the most experienced leaders. To make the most of a satisfaction measurement you need to help them by converting the scores, ratings, comments, and feedback into a holistic analysis.

First, which factors or drivers are the most important to focus on in their team. Second, what is the root cause for a decline in, for example, optimism. Third, what concrete actions can they take to improve the situation in their department or team.

These analyses can be complicated to make, but with Zoios' AI engine it happens automatically for every team, department, and unit. If you do this yourself, make sure an HR partner sits down with every manager to provide this context, analysis, and recommendations.

Customers

What our customers say.

Gut feelings, validated by data.

You can granulate the data and have more detail in terms of what is happening. So when we have a feeling we can actually validate if it's something we need to tackle or not. That's very powerful.

Gabrielle Damgaard-Mørk

Chief People Officer, 24Slides

Trends that drive everyday dialogue.

We can follow the trends and facilitate dialogues to make small or large changes in our everyday work-life, to ensure we accommodate what motivates people and develops them as consultants.

Helene Sarkel

Partner, NoA Connect

Frequently asked

  • How often should we measure satisfaction?

    Monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly. Once a year is too slow to spot what is actually changing in your organization.

  • How long should the survey be?

    Keep it to 10 to 12 quantitative questions. Anything beyond 15 hurts response rates without adding insight.

  • Are responses anonymous?

    Yes. Answers are aggregated and segmented. We never expose individual responses, even in small teams.

  • Do leaders get recommended actions?

    Yes. Every report includes concrete next steps tied to what your data shows, not just the scores.

Get started

Listen to your people. Act on what you hear.

Set up takes 5 minutes. The first month of Pro is on us.